<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for SuperTommy.me - Tommy Leung</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.supertommy.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.supertommy.com/blog</link>
	<description>Because Ordinary is Boring.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Foxconn Evil? by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.supertommy.com/blog/2011/08/28/is-foxconn-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-8243</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supertommy.com/blog/?p=1298#comment-8243</guid>
		<description>About Henry Ford: that was a great businessman. He paid his workers well and beyond the average factory wage. So does Foxconn. I think you are ignoring context. Ford famously paid his workers $5 a day which was incredible high at that time and place. Just as Foxconn&#039;s wages are high for China&#039;s time and place. When Ford was paying $5 a day wages, China was poor and warring. It was crazy and chaotic. America was coming out of one of the greatest economic prosperities of our time. To just ignore parts of history and cite others gives an unclear picture.

I truly believe we can have manufacturing jobs in America. We can&#039;t have it while our taxes are sky high--and let&#039;s not forget that when Ford was doing this there as no income tax in America--and our money is being inflated to never never land. Cheap money is a cause of lowered standards of living and our Federal Reserve is amongst the worst in modern day money printing. Our government debt is absolutely ridiculous today. In 1914, we had no such burdens. This is an entirely different time and place and that&#039;s why jobs have left. The government has become an impediment to America&#039;s prosperity. 

I buy American--and specifically local to where I am in NY--whenever I can because I believe in a local economy. I don&#039;t know where you get the idea that I&#039;m into what you call &quot;neoliberal globalization&quot;. I believe in free trade because trading helps everyone. I am not more interested in artificially inflating the bank accounts of the 1%. I have no problem if you make your money offering a good or service that people like. If you start taking it from the the people through the government because you&#039;re too big to fail or politically connected, that&#039;s a problem.

I did present facts. My post shows the numeric reality in present day China. Those are the wages. That is their population. Their history is one of chaos, war, and dictators. This is their century to join the rest of the developed world. They are doing it. I am not dilly dallying in what should be&#039;s, what if&#039;s, and feel-good statements, I&#039;m looking at it from what is. And that&#039;s what I see. They will not be poor in 50 years. This argument will be little but a blip in 50 years. Maybe countries in Africa will be the subject of the same discussion but, this is how it has been for hundreds of years from Europe to America. And in end, we&#039;ve all become richer for it. Foxconn&#039;s factories look like a resort compared to those of Ford&#039;s.

it is sad for the families to lose their loved ones. I&#039;m not saying it isn&#039;t. But, accidents happen all the time and this is not like sending children to run across a field to determine whether there are mines there or not. Foxconn tries to keep it&#039;s facilities safe but accidents will happen. That&#039;s all I&#039;m saying.

I had to respond to some of this. Had you just left it as a comment of insulting words then I would have just left it as is. :) Some things just aren&#039;t worth the time.

I do not value profits over people; that&#039;s a generalization. I do business with companies that I feel treat their customers well and their employees. I just believe Foxconn IS treating their employees well. I know that&#039;s the fundamental difference here. I have formal training in marketing but I&#039;m also an avid reader of economics, politics, history, and business-related topics. And even though you wouldn&#039;t be able to tell by this blog, I am a software developer by profession. And yes, I do work on iOS applications along with almost all the popular modern platforms.

And in the last three years, Apple has created an ecosystem for developers like I&#039;ve never seen. They literally created an industry out of nowhere. One that now supports thousands of small and large companies that provide jobs for people here and abroad. It&#039;s created a technology boom that doesn&#039;t appear to be a bubble. It&#039;s garnered more interest in VC investment in tech startups in NY and San Francisco than ever before. Granted, this isn&#039;t all Apple but, they played, and are playing, a huge role.

When I wrote this Foxconn article in 2011, I wasn&#039;t out to prove how great Foxconn was. All I heard was people repeating the same cliche about slave wages and their half-guilty chuckles for owning Foxconn made products. Not a single article I was pointed to included context so I wanted to find out for myself with the data available what the situation really was. And what I found is what I wrote here.

I also thank you for this civil discussion considering the general approach is to use some swear words and call it day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About Henry Ford: that was a great businessman. He paid his workers well and beyond the average factory wage. So does Foxconn. I think you are ignoring context. Ford famously paid his workers $5 a day which was incredible high at that time and place. Just as Foxconn&#8217;s wages are high for China&#8217;s time and place. When Ford was paying $5 a day wages, China was poor and warring. It was crazy and chaotic. America was coming out of one of the greatest economic prosperities of our time. To just ignore parts of history and cite others gives an unclear picture.</p>
<p>I truly believe we can have manufacturing jobs in America. We can&#8217;t have it while our taxes are sky high&#8211;and let&#8217;s not forget that when Ford was doing this there as no income tax in America&#8211;and our money is being inflated to never never land. Cheap money is a cause of lowered standards of living and our Federal Reserve is amongst the worst in modern day money printing. Our government debt is absolutely ridiculous today. In 1914, we had no such burdens. This is an entirely different time and place and that&#8217;s why jobs have left. The government has become an impediment to America&#8217;s prosperity. </p>
<p>I buy American&#8211;and specifically local to where I am in NY&#8211;whenever I can because I believe in a local economy. I don&#8217;t know where you get the idea that I&#8217;m into what you call &#8220;neoliberal globalization&#8221;. I believe in free trade because trading helps everyone. I am not more interested in artificially inflating the bank accounts of the 1%. I have no problem if you make your money offering a good or service that people like. If you start taking it from the the people through the government because you&#8217;re too big to fail or politically connected, that&#8217;s a problem.</p>
<p>I did present facts. My post shows the numeric reality in present day China. Those are the wages. That is their population. Their history is one of chaos, war, and dictators. This is their century to join the rest of the developed world. They are doing it. I am not dilly dallying in what should be&#8217;s, what if&#8217;s, and feel-good statements, I&#8217;m looking at it from what is. And that&#8217;s what I see. They will not be poor in 50 years. This argument will be little but a blip in 50 years. Maybe countries in Africa will be the subject of the same discussion but, this is how it has been for hundreds of years from Europe to America. And in end, we&#8217;ve all become richer for it. Foxconn&#8217;s factories look like a resort compared to those of Ford&#8217;s.</p>
<p>it is sad for the families to lose their loved ones. I&#8217;m not saying it isn&#8217;t. But, accidents happen all the time and this is not like sending children to run across a field to determine whether there are mines there or not. Foxconn tries to keep it&#8217;s facilities safe but accidents will happen. That&#8217;s all I&#8217;m saying.</p>
<p>I had to respond to some of this. Had you just left it as a comment of insulting words then I would have just left it as is. :) Some things just aren&#8217;t worth the time.</p>
<p>I do not value profits over people; that&#8217;s a generalization. I do business with companies that I feel treat their customers well and their employees. I just believe Foxconn IS treating their employees well. I know that&#8217;s the fundamental difference here. I have formal training in marketing but I&#8217;m also an avid reader of economics, politics, history, and business-related topics. And even though you wouldn&#8217;t be able to tell by this blog, I am a software developer by profession. And yes, I do work on iOS applications along with almost all the popular modern platforms.</p>
<p>And in the last three years, Apple has created an ecosystem for developers like I&#8217;ve never seen. They literally created an industry out of nowhere. One that now supports thousands of small and large companies that provide jobs for people here and abroad. It&#8217;s created a technology boom that doesn&#8217;t appear to be a bubble. It&#8217;s garnered more interest in VC investment in tech startups in NY and San Francisco than ever before. Granted, this isn&#8217;t all Apple but, they played, and are playing, a huge role.</p>
<p>When I wrote this Foxconn article in 2011, I wasn&#8217;t out to prove how great Foxconn was. All I heard was people repeating the same cliche about slave wages and their half-guilty chuckles for owning Foxconn made products. Not a single article I was pointed to included context so I wanted to find out for myself with the data available what the situation really was. And what I found is what I wrote here.</p>
<p>I also thank you for this civil discussion considering the general approach is to use some swear words and call it day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Foxconn Evil? by Reagan</title>
		<link>http://www.supertommy.com/blog/2011/08/28/is-foxconn-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-8242</link>
		<dc:creator>Reagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supertommy.com/blog/?p=1298#comment-8242</guid>
		<description>*I know you&#039;re into marketing, so you&#039;re taught* </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*I know you&#8217;re into marketing, so you&#8217;re taught*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Foxconn Evil? by Reagan</title>
		<link>http://www.supertommy.com/blog/2011/08/28/is-foxconn-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-8241</link>
		<dc:creator>Reagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supertommy.com/blog/?p=1298#comment-8241</guid>
		<description>&quot;I am not prepared to decide that a Foxconn worker is more important than the minimum wage worker with little skills at my local grocery store.&quot; That is such a terrible argument.  If you were paying the extra $100 for an i-phone it would be made in America and the 45 year old stocking shelves at the grociery store would have a manufacturing job he could probably support a family on.  All the unemployed teenagers could have grociery store jobs again.  That extra money from the American manufacturer would be in the local economy already.  Henry Ford understood this which is why he paid his workers well, so they could buy his cars, enrich the company, and build an economy.  China could then begin to work on their own problems.  Instead, we have neoliberal globalization which you think is a great idea because it allows the wealth of the top one tenth of one percent to skyrocket by expoiting cheap labor, and you are completely indoctrinated abandon normal human sympathy and  serve this system.  
&quot;I presented hard facts and maybe that is heartless.&quot;  You didn&#039;t present many facts at all.  You mainly just refuted mine with an unreasonable rhubric of truth,  shoddy argumentation, and then coldly dismissed the plight of these workers (suck it up, go make your life better) - which is heartless. 
&quot;this isn&#039;t a situation where Foxconn is literally losing large percentages of it&#039;s workforce to these accidents.&quot;  Tell that to the families of the &quot;small percent&quot; that have died that this is &quot;nothing to blow out of porportion.&quot;   
And with that, it&#039;s closing time for me on this thread, so I&#039;ll give you the last word if you like or we can leave it here.  I know your into marketing, so your taught to value profits over people, but I sincerely hope you consider business ethics and contemplate with compassion the issues that really hurt people.  Even though we have fundamental disagreements about this issue, thank you for a civil discussion.  
-Reagan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I am not prepared to decide that a Foxconn worker is more important than the minimum wage worker with little skills at my local grocery store.&#8221; That is such a terrible argument.  If you were paying the extra $100 for an i-phone it would be made in America and the 45 year old stocking shelves at the grociery store would have a manufacturing job he could probably support a family on.  All the unemployed teenagers could have grociery store jobs again.  That extra money from the American manufacturer would be in the local economy already.  Henry Ford understood this which is why he paid his workers well, so they could buy his cars, enrich the company, and build an economy.  China could then begin to work on their own problems.  Instead, we have neoliberal globalization which you think is a great idea because it allows the wealth of the top one tenth of one percent to skyrocket by expoiting cheap labor, and you are completely indoctrinated abandon normal human sympathy and  serve this system. <br />
&#8220;I presented hard facts and maybe that is heartless.&#8221;  You didn&#8217;t present many facts at all.  You mainly just refuted mine with an unreasonable rhubric of truth,  shoddy argumentation, and then coldly dismissed the plight of these workers (suck it up, go make your life better) &#8211; which is heartless. <br />
&#8220;this isn&#8217;t a situation where Foxconn is literally losing large percentages of it&#8217;s workforce to these accidents.&#8221;  Tell that to the families of the &#8220;small percent&#8221; that have died that this is &#8220;nothing to blow out of porportion.&#8221;   <br />
And with that, it&#8217;s closing time for me on this thread, so I&#8217;ll give you the last word if you like or we can leave it here.  I know your into marketing, so your taught to value profits over people, but I sincerely hope you consider business ethics and contemplate with compassion the issues that really hurt people.  Even though we have fundamental disagreements about this issue, thank you for a civil discussion. <br />
-Reagan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Foxconn Evil? by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.supertommy.com/blog/2011/08/28/is-foxconn-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-8240</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supertommy.com/blog/?p=1298#comment-8240</guid>
		<description>I did read this article. I thought it was fairly good. There was some clear slant and I don&#039;t disagree that Foxconn should improve working conditions if people are dying but, let&#039;s not blow this our of proportion as accidents happen and this isn&#039;t a situation where Foxconn is literally losing large percentages of it&#039;s workforce to these accidents.

It does Foxconn no good to kill it&#039;s employees as training new employees is not free.

The Times article noted statements from Foxconn as well which i liked even though I don&#039;t think anyone took Foxconn&#039;s statements as anything outside of an evil corporation lying. They might be or they might not. I have no reason to believe that they are any more truthful that the 1600 Foxconn employees who were interviewed.

I also read about the suicide protest from workers working on XBOX 360&#039;s at Foxconn as well and that was resolved. Why these workers threatened suicide is a mystery to me and I haven&#039;t gone to investigate it so I won&#039;t make any assumptions.

But, to paint Foxconn as some blood-soaked evil corporation is entirely unfair. At the end of the day, there is no reason any of Foxconn&#039;s workers need to work there. If you can explain to me why these people won&#039;t go work for that amazing non-existent fairy tale factory then I&#039;d love to hear it.

Also, a great deal of the anti-Foxconn information comes from anecdotal accounts by former employees. It is not surprising the disgruntled ex-employees have nothing nice to say. It is also not surprising that interviewing 1600 Foxconn employees and discovering that they would all rather work fewer hours for more pay--who wouldn&#039;t? This is what I&#039;m talking about when I say these studies are flawed.

I presented hard facts and maybe that is heartless. Fine. But, I also know that even if we all spent $50 or $100 extra dollars for iPads, iPhones, Macbook&#039;s, XBOX&#039;s, or whatever Foxconn is producing in order to improve the factories or increase pay, that $50 or $100 isn&#039;t a magic trick. That&#039;s money you spent on an iPad instead of at your local grocery store or at Target or somewhere else.

It might not matter if you and i individually decide to do that but, when 15.4 million people--that&#039;s how many iPad&#039;s Apple moved in Q4 of 2011--that&#039;s a lot of money and those are other people&#039;s jobs that you don&#039;t see. I am not prepared to decide that a Foxconn worker is more important than the minimum wage worker with little skills at my local grocery store.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did read this article. I thought it was fairly good. There was some clear slant and I don&#8217;t disagree that Foxconn should improve working conditions if people are dying but, let&#8217;s not blow this our of proportion as accidents happen and this isn&#8217;t a situation where Foxconn is literally losing large percentages of it&#8217;s workforce to these accidents.</p>
<p>It does Foxconn no good to kill it&#8217;s employees as training new employees is not free.</p>
<p>The Times article noted statements from Foxconn as well which i liked even though I don&#8217;t think anyone took Foxconn&#8217;s statements as anything outside of an evil corporation lying. They might be or they might not. I have no reason to believe that they are any more truthful that the 1600 Foxconn employees who were interviewed.</p>
<p>I also read about the suicide protest from workers working on XBOX 360&#8242;s at Foxconn as well and that was resolved. Why these workers threatened suicide is a mystery to me and I haven&#8217;t gone to investigate it so I won&#8217;t make any assumptions.</p>
<p>But, to paint Foxconn as some blood-soaked evil corporation is entirely unfair. At the end of the day, there is no reason any of Foxconn&#8217;s workers need to work there. If you can explain to me why these people won&#8217;t go work for that amazing non-existent fairy tale factory then I&#8217;d love to hear it.</p>
<p>Also, a great deal of the anti-Foxconn information comes from anecdotal accounts by former employees. It is not surprising the disgruntled ex-employees have nothing nice to say. It is also not surprising that interviewing 1600 Foxconn employees and discovering that they would all rather work fewer hours for more pay&#8211;who wouldn&#8217;t? This is what I&#8217;m talking about when I say these studies are flawed.</p>
<p>I presented hard facts and maybe that is heartless. Fine. But, I also know that even if we all spent $50 or $100 extra dollars for iPads, iPhones, Macbook&#8217;s, XBOX&#8217;s, or whatever Foxconn is producing in order to improve the factories or increase pay, that $50 or $100 isn&#8217;t a magic trick. That&#8217;s money you spent on an iPad instead of at your local grocery store or at Target or somewhere else.</p>
<p>It might not matter if you and i individually decide to do that but, when 15.4 million people&#8211;that&#8217;s how many iPad&#8217;s Apple moved in Q4 of 2011&#8211;that&#8217;s a lot of money and those are other people&#8217;s jobs that you don&#8217;t see. I am not prepared to decide that a Foxconn worker is more important than the minimum wage worker with little skills at my local grocery store.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Foxconn Evil? by Reagan</title>
		<link>http://www.supertommy.com/blog/2011/08/28/is-foxconn-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-8239</link>
		<dc:creator>Reagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supertommy.com/blog/?p=1298#comment-8239</guid>
		<description>Hey Tommy,
Did you see the cover of the New York Times today?
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/26/business/ieconomy-apples-ipad-and-the-human-costs-for-workers-in-china.html?_r=1&amp;hp
I think it&#039;s time you rethink your position on the matter (and your worldview).  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tommy,<br />
Did you see the cover of the New York Times today?<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/26/business/ieconomy-apples-ipad-and-the-human-costs-for-workers-in-china.html?_r=1&#038;hp" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/26/business/ieconomy-apples-ipad-and-the-human-costs-for-workers-in-china.html?_r=1&#038;hp</a><br />
I think it&#8217;s time you rethink your position on the matter (and your worldview). </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Foxconn Evil? by Reagan</title>
		<link>http://www.supertommy.com/blog/2011/08/28/is-foxconn-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-8238</link>
		<dc:creator>Reagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supertommy.com/blog/?p=1298#comment-8238</guid>
		<description>The study is not flawed, but there is a reason the study was based on interviews.  Foxconn is a very secretive organization.  They, wisely, don&#039;t want the world to know what goes on in their factories.  Putting that aside, I have no idea what the workers in these factories should do.  I don&#039;t pretend to.  But to acknowledge someone is opressed, and to try to join their struggle because decisions made in your country have led to their opression is not insulting.  What is insulting (and heartless) is to tell people &quot;that is life, go work someplace else.&quot;  Because their other option is &quot;abject poverty on a farm&quot; that doesn&#039;t make Foxconn good.  Only the textbook definition of exploitation.
Finally, I think you misunderstood my point about rationalizing your beliefs due to your love of technology.  I didn&#039;t mean anything about technology itself being inherently good or bad, I meant you love Apple products so much, you are willing to blindly dismiss any evidence that might paint them in a bad light, the testimony of 1,600 workers or 17 suicides all done in the same greusome, public way for example.  I&#039;m saying, you love fancy Apple gadgets so much, it blinds you to the suffering they cause expoited workers who, were it not for the totalitarian bludgeon over their heads, would be on strike, struggling against their immoral boss tomorrow.  
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/2a117476-3f49-11e1-ad6a-00144feab49a.html#axzz1k8wd21O8 
I think we are coming at this from different perspectives: one of normal human sympathy and the other of uncaring, &quot;that&#039;s life.  If you want something better, go work for it (nevermind the violent police state you live under).&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The study is not flawed, but there is a reason the study was based on interviews.  Foxconn is a very secretive organization.  They, wisely, don&#8217;t want the world to know what goes on in their factories.  Putting that aside, I have no idea what the workers in these factories should do.  I don&#8217;t pretend to.  But to acknowledge someone is opressed, and to try to join their struggle because decisions made in your country have led to their opression is not insulting.  What is insulting (and heartless) is to tell people &#8220;that is life, go work someplace else.&#8221;  Because their other option is &#8220;abject poverty on a farm&#8221; that doesn&#8217;t make Foxconn good.  Only the textbook definition of exploitation.<br />
Finally, I think you misunderstood my point about rationalizing your beliefs due to your love of technology.  I didn&#8217;t mean anything about technology itself being inherently good or bad, I meant you love Apple products so much, you are willing to blindly dismiss any evidence that might paint them in a bad light, the testimony of 1,600 workers or 17 suicides all done in the same greusome, public way for example.  I&#8217;m saying, you love fancy Apple gadgets so much, it blinds you to the suffering they cause expoited workers who, were it not for the totalitarian bludgeon over their heads, would be on strike, struggling against their immoral boss tomorrow. <br />
<a href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/2a117476-3f49-11e1-ad6a-00144feab49a.html#axzz1k8wd21O8" rel="nofollow">http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/2a117476-3f49-11e1-ad6a-00144feab49a.html#axzz1k8wd21O8</a><br />
I think we are coming at this from different perspectives: one of normal human sympathy and the other of uncaring, &#8220;that&#8217;s life.  If you want something better, go work for it (nevermind the violent police state you live under).&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Foxconn Evil? by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.supertommy.com/blog/2011/08/28/is-foxconn-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-8237</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 19:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supertommy.com/blog/?p=1298#comment-8237</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say the same about the lie that minimum wage and &quot;worker&#039;s rights&quot; laws help people in any run long or short. We&#039;re coming from different perspectives.

I have no sympathies toward the Chinese government or their arbitrary minimum wage laws; I feel the same about minimum wage laws everywhere. However, it is the stance of the proponents of minimum wage laws and various other laws that an entity evil enough to jail and kill it&#039;s own citizens should also be tasked to handle the well being of its citizens.

As far as that study you noted, I looked at the link you had and there is no hard facts anywhere. An interview with 1600 workers is very obviously not a good source of objective information. Studies that rely on observational evidence or interviews is not hard evidence.

Even if we ignored that flaw, what exactly do you suppose these Chinese workers do otherwise? Foxconn can tell them to work triple overtime but, they don&#039;t have to do. Go work somewhere else. Unless the alternatives are worse. In which case, how moral would it be to force people to live in a worse situation because we don&#039;t like the ones they are currently in?

Life is not easy. If the Foxconn workers don&#039;t like their job, they can go work somewhere else. If there&#039;s no other options then, well, that is life. If you want something better, you work for it. No one owes anyone anything and there is never a guarantee anyone will get what they want.

I don&#039;t need to rationalize technology; I know it does the world good. It is those who walk around believing a poorly paid worker at a Foxconn worker is suffering so that they can have an iPhone that needs to rationalize--by guilting themselves or some other way.

The options these Chinese workers have is abject poverty on a farm or a means to better their lot in life at a Foxconn factory. If there was another way, they&#039;d do it. To think that poor people in China are too stupid to figure that out is insulting to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say the same about the lie that minimum wage and &#8220;worker&#8217;s rights&#8221; laws help people in any run long or short. We&#8217;re coming from different perspectives.</p>
<p>I have no sympathies toward the Chinese government or their arbitrary minimum wage laws; I feel the same about minimum wage laws everywhere. However, it is the stance of the proponents of minimum wage laws and various other laws that an entity evil enough to jail and kill it&#8217;s own citizens should also be tasked to handle the well being of its citizens.</p>
<p>As far as that study you noted, I looked at the link you had and there is no hard facts anywhere. An interview with 1600 workers is very obviously not a good source of objective information. Studies that rely on observational evidence or interviews is not hard evidence.</p>
<p>Even if we ignored that flaw, what exactly do you suppose these Chinese workers do otherwise? Foxconn can tell them to work triple overtime but, they don&#8217;t have to do. Go work somewhere else. Unless the alternatives are worse. In which case, how moral would it be to force people to live in a worse situation because we don&#8217;t like the ones they are currently in?</p>
<p>Life is not easy. If the Foxconn workers don&#8217;t like their job, they can go work somewhere else. If there&#8217;s no other options then, well, that is life. If you want something better, you work for it. No one owes anyone anything and there is never a guarantee anyone will get what they want.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t need to rationalize technology; I know it does the world good. It is those who walk around believing a poorly paid worker at a Foxconn worker is suffering so that they can have an iPhone that needs to rationalize&#8211;by guilting themselves or some other way.</p>
<p>The options these Chinese workers have is abject poverty on a farm or a means to better their lot in life at a Foxconn factory. If there was another way, they&#8217;d do it. To think that poor people in China are too stupid to figure that out is insulting to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Foxconn Evil? by Reagan</title>
		<link>http://www.supertommy.com/blog/2011/08/28/is-foxconn-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-8236</link>
		<dc:creator>Reagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 18:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supertommy.com/blog/?p=1298#comment-8236</guid>
		<description>Sorry Tommy, I don&#039;t know how many people you will convince with the &#039;sweatshops help people in the long run&#039; lie.  Or the weak argument, &#039;because Foxconn pays their workers 1.7x more than other terrible factories - in a totalitarian state where people will be jailed or killed for starting a union - that makes them humain.&#039;  I am more likely to believe esearchers representing twenty universities from Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the mainland who released a report describing Foxconn factories as “labor camps” which severely violate a whole host of Chinese labor laws.  http://www.reaganmsova.com/2011/10/steve-jobs-influential-and-immoral.html
I see you love video games, and that is great, but make sure you don&#039;t rationalize your love of technology in ways that really hurt and oppress people. 
-RS </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Tommy, I don&#8217;t know how many people you will convince with the &#8216;sweatshops help people in the long run&#8217; lie.  Or the weak argument, &#8216;because Foxconn pays their workers 1.7x more than other terrible factories &#8211; in a totalitarian state where people will be jailed or killed for starting a union &#8211; that makes them humain.&#8217;  I am more likely to believe esearchers representing twenty universities from Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the mainland who released a report describing Foxconn factories as “labor camps” which severely violate a whole host of Chinese labor laws.  <a href="http://www.reaganmsova.com/2011/10/steve-jobs-influential-and-immoral.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.reaganmsova.com/2011/10/steve-jobs-influential-and-immoral.html</a><br />
I see you love video games, and that is great, but make sure you don&#8217;t rationalize your love of technology in ways that really hurt and oppress people. <br />
-RS </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Foxconn Evil? by Fuddyman_25</title>
		<link>http://www.supertommy.com/blog/2011/08/28/is-foxconn-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-8235</link>
		<dc:creator>Fuddyman_25</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supertommy.com/blog/?p=1298#comment-8235</guid>
		<description>fuck you, work in a factory for shit pay with terrible hours and get back to me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fuck you, work in a factory for shit pay with terrible hours and get back to me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wheels of Fury Cheats by Casey-burtenshaw</title>
		<link>http://www.supertommy.com/blog/2008/07/01/wheels-of-fury-cheats/comment-page-1/#comment-8233</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey-burtenshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supertommy.com/blog/?p=45#comment-8233</guid>
		<description>hi the cheats are sweet thay work so good and im 12 so i cheat lots</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi the cheats are sweet thay work so good and im 12 so i cheat lots</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vegetarians Don&#8217;t Save Animals by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.supertommy.com/blog/2011/09/29/vegetarians-dont-save-animals/comment-page-1/#comment-8232</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supertommy.com/blog/?p=1104#comment-8232</guid>
		<description>lol, yes, I meant moral and not morale--I just typed moral as morale, my fingers for some reason want to spell out morale when I think moral.

But, I agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol, yes, I meant moral and not morale&#8211;I just typed moral as morale, my fingers for some reason want to spell out morale when I think moral.</p>
<p>But, I agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vegetarians Don&#8217;t Save Animals by David James</title>
		<link>http://www.supertommy.com/blog/2011/09/29/vegetarians-dont-save-animals/comment-page-1/#comment-8231</link>
		<dc:creator>David James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supertommy.com/blog/?p=1104#comment-8231</guid>
		<description>I have to get one thing out of the way, I&#039;m sure you meant moral as opposed to morale. Drove me crazy. 

Interesting viewpoint on the situation, and probably correct on the face of it. Unfortunately, in order to actually eat &#039;humanely&#039; raised livestock, you&#039;d have to either raise it yourself, or trust someone else to do it. To me, this means buying locally where I&#039;d be aware of the practices on the farm in question. To trust some sort of formal certification process is like trusting that food labeled &#039;organic&#039; never saw a pesticide, herbicide, or chemical fertilizer in it&#039;s life. Lobbying groups have already muddied those waters. Don&#039;t even get me started on the definitions of &#039;free range&#039; and &#039;cage free&#039;. So, until I&#039;m back in a position to locally source any meat I may want to consume, I&#039;ll stick to being a vegetarian, although technically an ovo-pescatarian. To dispel any assumptions, I&#039;ll also mention that I&#039;ve hunted, fished, and been in a small scale slaughterhouse, none of which affected my decision to eat meat. Driving by a industrial chicken &#039;factory&#039; did more, that and seeing conditions in which the food we eat lives.

Still, I encourage those who are sticking with their meat to make the decision to buy &#039;free range&#039; and &#039;cage free&#039; even if the definition falls short of what you might expect. It&#039;s better than doing nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to get one thing out of the way, I&#8217;m sure you meant moral as opposed to morale. Drove me crazy. </p>
<p>Interesting viewpoint on the situation, and probably correct on the face of it. Unfortunately, in order to actually eat &#8216;humanely&#8217; raised livestock, you&#8217;d have to either raise it yourself, or trust someone else to do it. To me, this means buying locally where I&#8217;d be aware of the practices on the farm in question. To trust some sort of formal certification process is like trusting that food labeled &#8216;organic&#8217; never saw a pesticide, herbicide, or chemical fertilizer in it&#8217;s life. Lobbying groups have already muddied those waters. Don&#8217;t even get me started on the definitions of &#8216;free range&#8217; and &#8216;cage free&#8217;. So, until I&#8217;m back in a position to locally source any meat I may want to consume, I&#8217;ll stick to being a vegetarian, although technically an ovo-pescatarian. To dispel any assumptions, I&#8217;ll also mention that I&#8217;ve hunted, fished, and been in a small scale slaughterhouse, none of which affected my decision to eat meat. Driving by a industrial chicken &#8216;factory&#8217; did more, that and seeing conditions in which the food we eat lives.</p>
<p>Still, I encourage those who are sticking with their meat to make the decision to buy &#8216;free range&#8217; and &#8216;cage free&#8217; even if the definition falls short of what you might expect. It&#8217;s better than doing nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Low Carb, Paleo, and Deadly Fructose by Obesity starts in the brain&#160;/&#160; Getting Stronger</title>
		<link>http://www.supertommy.com/blog/2011/04/25/low-carb-paleo-and-deadly-fructose/comment-page-1/#comment-8230</link>
		<dc:creator>Obesity starts in the brain&#160;/&#160; Getting Stronger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 20:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supertommy.com/blog/?p=1191#comment-8230</guid>
		<description>[...] two types &#8212; triglycerides and one particular fatty acid.  Can you guess which fatty acid?  The answer is palmitic acid, the fatty acid associated with brain insulin resistance. The liver begins to accumulate the excess [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] two types &#8212; triglycerides and one particular fatty acid.  Can you guess which fatty acid?  The answer is palmitic acid, the fatty acid associated with brain insulin resistance. The liver begins to accumulate the excess [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Foxconn Evil? by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.supertommy.com/blog/2011/08/28/is-foxconn-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-8229</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supertommy.com/blog/?p=1298#comment-8229</guid>
		<description>Bill,

The analogy of smoke and fire is faulty at best. Where there&#039;s fire, there&#039;s bound to be smoke because smoke and fire go hand in hand. However, suicide and long work hours do not correlate nearly as well. It&#039;s not even close.

I also did not say the suicides are all a big coincidence. I just said I do not know why they are committing suicide en masse but, I noted that Foxconn is subsidizing deaths. I&#039;ll quote myself from the second paragraph:

&quot;Most of the outrage over Foxconn came about as reports of their employees committing suicide piled up. Why these folks are committing suicide is anyone’s guess. However, this big bad slave driving company gives the families of deceased employees 8.5 – 10 years worth of wages.&quot;

If you are saying the correlation between a great deal of work hours and suicide are as tight as that of fire and smoke then one would expect suicides to be happening to every employee there. It is not. Accounts in this country work just as many or more hours during their busy season and we do not have mass funerals for accounts during this time.

If you would like to demonstrate how the everybody wins part is bogus, please do. Otherwise, you just sound like you&#039;re blowing smoke. I&#039;m not saying I know everything but, I demonstrated facts in terms of Foxconn&#039;s wages and working hours as well as the economic principles of value and how economies grow. You are more than welcome to refute it. Calling it bogus demonstrates nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,</p>
<p>The analogy of smoke and fire is faulty at best. Where there&#8217;s fire, there&#8217;s bound to be smoke because smoke and fire go hand in hand. However, suicide and long work hours do not correlate nearly as well. It&#8217;s not even close.</p>
<p>I also did not say the suicides are all a big coincidence. I just said I do not know why they are committing suicide en masse but, I noted that Foxconn is subsidizing deaths. I&#8217;ll quote myself from the second paragraph:</p>
<p>&#8220;Most of the outrage over Foxconn came about as reports of their employees committing suicide piled up. Why these folks are committing suicide is anyone’s guess. However, this big bad slave driving company gives the families of deceased employees 8.5 – 10 years worth of wages.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you are saying the correlation between a great deal of work hours and suicide are as tight as that of fire and smoke then one would expect suicides to be happening to every employee there. It is not. Accounts in this country work just as many or more hours during their busy season and we do not have mass funerals for accounts during this time.</p>
<p>If you would like to demonstrate how the everybody wins part is bogus, please do. Otherwise, you just sound like you&#8217;re blowing smoke. I&#8217;m not saying I know everything but, I demonstrated facts in terms of Foxconn&#8217;s wages and working hours as well as the economic principles of value and how economies grow. You are more than welcome to refute it. Calling it bogus demonstrates nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Foxconn Evil? by Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.supertommy.com/blog/2011/08/28/is-foxconn-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-8228</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 06:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supertommy.com/blog/?p=1298#comment-8228</guid>
		<description>To the writer of the article: Ever heard the saying &quot;Where there is smoke, there is usually a fire&quot;?

I must say, I&#039;ve never heard of any other company having even close to as many of their employees kill themselves.  The fact that you are trying to say the conditions of the work and their deaths are separate issues is ridiculous.  Seriously, you&#039;re making it sound like all these suicides are a big coincidence.  Again, where there is smoke, there is usually a fire.  

I could go on, but I&#039;ll finish by saying that article shows a complete lack of understanding of the situation and just a lot of ignorance on your part.  The &quot;Everbody Wins&quot; section is bogus...  just bogus.  I wish I could be a little less blunt, but that would take away from my point.  I guess I just find this article to be quite obtuse and ignorant.  Again, not trying to be a jerk about it, but I&#039;m simply stating the facts.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the writer of the article: Ever heard the saying &#8220;Where there is smoke, there is usually a fire&#8221;?</p>
<p>I must say, I&#8217;ve never heard of any other company having even close to as many of their employees kill themselves.  The fact that you are trying to say the conditions of the work and their deaths are separate issues is ridiculous.  Seriously, you&#8217;re making it sound like all these suicides are a big coincidence.  Again, where there is smoke, there is usually a fire.  </p>
<p>I could go on, but I&#8217;ll finish by saying that article shows a complete lack of understanding of the situation and just a lot of ignorance on your part.  The &#8220;Everbody Wins&#8221; section is bogus&#8230;  just bogus.  I wish I could be a little less blunt, but that would take away from my point.  I guess I just find this article to be quite obtuse and ignorant.  Again, not trying to be a jerk about it, but I&#8217;m simply stating the facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

